Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Punishment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bandy, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

When the policy becomes the problem

Criminal justice in the new millennium

Sara Steen

Rachel Bandy

University of Colorado, Boulder, USA

In this article, we document a shift in public conversations about punishment in the United States that has occurred as a result of a collision between the principles of punishment that have dominated public policy for the past three decades and the fiscal realities of the 21st century. Over the past three decades, legislators have created a conversation in which the inclusion of principles other than retribution and revenge is virtually impossible. This absence of practical considerations has led to policies that are, in many cases, outrageously expensive. During the past five years, many state governments have seen their expenses grossly outpace their revenues, leaving legislators now to face a reality in which the ‘Get Tough’ policies of the 1980s and 1990s are no longer economically sustainable. We argue that the changing fiscal situation provides a context in which the rhetoric of punishment is finally open to change, and we document some of the rhetorical shifts that occur.

Key Words: criminal justice • public policy

Punishment & Society, Vol. 9, No. 1, 5-26 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1462474507070548


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?