Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Punishment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The dog that did not bark

Punitive social views and the ‘professional middle classes’

Elizabeth K. Brown

University at Albany, USA

Scholars have identified many interrelated factors that may explain a rise in punitive social control policies during the last 35 years. David Garland, for example, in The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society, describes a fall in penal welfarism and a rise of a new culture of control in the context of the complex political, economic and social changes experienced from the 1970s through the late 1990s. Garland claims that the ‘liberal elites, best educated middle classes and public sector professionals’, once the champions of liberal penal welfarism, have been influential in the rise of a new culture of control because they have come to hold increasingly punitive social views. Using data from the US General Social Survey, this study considers the social control views of three possible conceptualizations of Garland's population of interest and fails to find support for his claim. The implications of this study are discussed, and special attention is given to issues of defining punitivity, and to unresolved questions about the role of the public in contemporary American penal culture.

Key Words: penal populism • public opinion • punitive views • social control

Punishment & Society, Vol. 8, No. 3, 287-312 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1462474506062101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
M. A. Paparozzi and J. M. Caplan
A Profile of Paroling Authorities in America: The Strange Bedfellows of Politics and Professionalism
The Prison Journal, December 1, 2009; 89(4): 401 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
D. A. Green
Feeding Wolves: Punitiveness and Culture
European Journal of Criminology, November 1, 2009; 6(6): 517 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]