Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Punishment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doob, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sprott, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Punishing youth crime in Canada

The blind men and the elephant

Anthony N. Doob

Jane B. Sprott

University of Toronto, Canada and University of Guelph, Canada

The Government of Canada, in its 2003 changes in the law governing young offenders, managed to appear to be ‘tough on crime’ while, at the same time, attempting to reduce the use of the formal youth justice system. This was accomplished by focusing public statements on tough, symbolic measures that had little impact on the manner in which young offenders were punished while at the same time promoting, in its legislation, attempts to reduce the rates of formal processing and of incarceration of young people. It is understandable, then, that some critics, including academics, who focused on public statements described Canada's new youth law as being unnecessarily harsh. We suggest, on the basis of an analysis of the law and of its administration – including comprehensive sentencing data showing no real increase in punitiveness over the past decade or so – that the law as written and administered is quite different from the way in which it has been described in this journal and in the Canadian mass media. In this way, the Government of Canada was able to have its cake and eat it, too.

Key Words: Canada • punishment • youth justice legislation

Punishment & Society, Vol. 8, No. 2, 223-233 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1462474506062106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
J. Minkes
Review Essay: Change, Continuity, and Public Opinion in Youth Justice: Doob, A., & Cesaroni, C. (2004). Responding to Youth Crime in Canada. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. Pp. 305. Campbell, K. M. (Ed.). (2005). Understanding Youth Justice in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall. Pp. 377. Carrington, P. J., & Schulenburg, J. (Eds.). (2004). Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Volume 46 3, Special Issue: The Youth Criminal Justice Act. Tonry, M., & Doob, A. (2004). Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 633
International Criminal Justice Review, December 1, 2007; 17(4): 340 - 349.
[PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
B. Hogeveen
Memoir of a/the blind: A reply to Doob and Sprott1
Punishment Society, October 1, 2006; 8(4): 469 - 475.
[PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
A. N. Doob and J. B. Sprott
Assessing punitiveness in Canadian youth justice: A response to Hogeveen
Punishment Society, October 1, 2006; 8(4): 477 - 480.
[PDF]