Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Punishment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The punitive consequences of consumer culture

Barry Vaughan

Institute of Public Administration, Dublin, Ireland

This article takes as its starting point a public punitiveness that is novel in its lack of sympathy for and stridency against offenders. It is suggested that this punitiveness can be partly explained by the ascent of consumerism as an axial principle of life today. The ideas of René Girard are used to elaborate upon this suggestion. Girard argues that disputes emerge within cultures when there are no public prohibitions on consumption. Desires converge on the same objects, producing conflicts that can only be resolved by a scapegoating mechanism. Although markets have always threatened to deregulate desires, there have usually been countervailing movements. The novelty of the consumer society is that while few goods are prescribed by custom, they no longer possess stable values. This exacerbates the anxiety predicted by Girard and scapegoating becomes more intensive in an effort to ground the value of objects of desire.

Key Words: consumerism • mimetic desire • punitiveness • René Girard • scapegoating • sectarian culture

Punishment & Society, Vol. 4, No. 2, 195-211 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14624740222228545
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Punishment SocietyHome page
I. Loader
Ice cream and incarceration: On appetites for security and punishment
Punishment Society, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 241 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J CriminolHome page
S. Maruna Dr
Crime, Punishment and the Search for Order in Ireland
Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2007; 47(6): 980 - 982.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Theoretical CriminologyHome page
D. Garland
Concepts of culture in the sociology of punishment
Theoretical Criminology, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 419 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Punishment SocietyHome page
E. K. Brown
The dog that did not bark: Punitive social views and the 'professional middle classes'
Punishment Society, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 287 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]