This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by CARLEN, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Death and the Triumph of Governance?

Lessons from the Scottish Women's Prison

Keele University, UK

Analyses of the consciously moral attempts to combat suicide at a women's prison via organizational innovation provide important lessons not only in the governance of women's prisons, but also in the conditionality and politics of contemporary penal probity. At the policy level they call into question the adequacy of quantitative methods for assessing staff efficiency in delivering an appropriate anti-suicide policy. In the realms of theory and penal politics they provoke an unease with studies in governmentality which give primacy to the teleological meanings of explicitly reform-oriented penal strategies. Insofar as such analyses omit to specify the points at which prevailing power relations and their conventional practices were under threat or open to challenge, they also omit to identify new configurations of resistance to penal oppression. Thus, while, on the one hand, successive studies of governmentality suggest that prevailing power relations ensure that all practices of imprisonment are inevitably illegitimate, and, on the other, successive governments continue to evaluate women's prisons according to totally inappropriate criteria, present opportunities to recognize, record and extend the genuinely therapeutic practices which reduce the damaging pain of women in penal custody will be lost. Either they will not appear in teleological depictions of an evertriumphant governmentality; or they will be suppressed by official audits looking for quantitative evidence that the prisons are `good value for money'. Possibilities for a `remoralization' of prison regimes will thereby be occluded by the mystifications of a positivist empiricism and a theoreticist social theory.

Key Words: governmentality • prisons • remoralization • suicide

Punishment & Society, Vol. 3, No. 4, 459-471 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/14624740122228366


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?