This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BECKETT, K. Articles by WESTERN, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Governing Social Marginality

Welfare, Incarceration, and the Transformation of State Policy

University of Washington, USA and Princeton University, USA

BRUCE WESTERN

University of Washington, USA and Princeton University, USA

Rapid growth of the US penal population over the last two decades has coincided with a decline in the number of welfare recipients. While shifts in crime rates, economic and political considerations most commonly account for variations in incarceration, we place the rise in incarceration levels in the institutional context of welfare state retrenchment. An analysis of state-level incarceration rates between 1975 and 1995 indicates that large penal systems are found in states with weak welfare systems. The negative relationship between welfare and incarceration grows over time, suggesting the emergence of a novel kind of penal-welfare regime in the late 1980s and 1990s. Although welfare state retrenchment is often interpreted as a kind of market deregulation, our analysis suggests that declining support for social welfare is part of a punitive policy development in which the state has a substantial and active role.

Key Words: imprisonment • race • social control • state policy • welfare

Punishment & Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 43-59 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/14624740122228249


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. de Koster, J. van der Waal, P. Achterberg, and D. Houtman The Rise of the Penal State: Neo-Liberalization or New Political Culture? Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2008; 48(6): 720 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Frost The mismeasure of punishment: Alternative measures of punitiveness and their (substantial) consequences Punishment Society, July 1, 2008; 10(3): 277 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Stucky, K. Heimer, and J. B. Lang A Bigger Piece of the Pie? State Corrections Spending and the Politics of Social Order Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2007; 44(1): 91 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Cavadino and J. Dignan Penal policy and political economy JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2006; 6(4): 435 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-E. Sung Democracy and Criminal Justice in Cross-National Perspective: From Crime Control to Due Process The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2006; 605(1): 311 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. G. Lambert and E. A. Paoline III The impact of medical issues on the job stress and job satisfaction of jail staff Punishment Society, July 1, 2005; 7(3): 259 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ruddell Social disruption, state priorities, and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment Punishment Society, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 7 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]