Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Punishment & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Punishment and the cultural limits to state power in late 18th-century Britain

James J. Willis

George Mason University, USA

The late 18th century is widely regarded as a time of rapid and momentous change in European and US penal history. Having identified this as the crucial formative period of the modern penitentiary, scholars naturally have sought to explain the developments that contributed to this modern form of punishment. However, at least in the case of Britain, this was also a time of continuity. Despite the well-publicized efforts of prison reformers, seminal prison legislation, and the end of transportation to America, Britain did not cease conveying its felons overseas. The question arises, 'Why did Britain resume transporting its offenders to New South Wales despite the opportunity and impetus for prison reform?' This article challenges more instrumental economic, strategic, and social control explanations by placing transportation within a broader expressive or cultural context. Since state punishments are some of the clearest and most brutal displays of state coercion, their application can generate questions about the nature of state authority and human freedoms. Using historical documents and secondary sources, this case study seeks to uncover the broader cultural understandings of the State's capacity to punish in order to explain why Britain continued to expel its offenders overseas. In doing so, it draws attention to how transportation operated within existing social relations between rulers and ruled — relations that were centered on the practical experiences of liberty and influenced by emergent democratic sentiments.

Key Words: culture • penal history • penitentiary • state • transportation

Punishment & Society, Vol. 10, No. 4, 401-428 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1462474508095318


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?